Analyser never less dense than the FFT bands
This commit is contained in:
parent
6fcdd0a158
commit
487a53dcc7
20
analyser.h
20
analyser.h
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct AnalyserSTFX : public BaseEffect {
|
||||
|
||||
storage.range("barkResolution", barkResolution)
|
||||
.info("res.", "in Bark scale")
|
||||
.range(1, 10, 25)
|
||||
.range(2, 10, 25)
|
||||
.unit("", 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (storage.extra()) {
|
||||
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct AnalyserSTFX : public BaseEffect {
|
||||
|
||||
stft.configure(channels, 0, stftBlockMs*0.001*sampleRate, stftIntervalMs*0.001*sampleRate);
|
||||
subRate = sampleRate/stft.defaultInterval();
|
||||
bands = spectrum.resize(channels, barkResolution, sampleRate);
|
||||
bands = spectrum.resize(channels, barkResolution, sampleRate, stft.blockSamples());
|
||||
updateBands();
|
||||
tmp.resize(stft.defaultInterval());
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ private:
|
||||
void stftStep() {
|
||||
if (barkResolution != prevBarkResolution) {
|
||||
prevBarkResolution = barkResolution;
|
||||
bands = spectrum.resize(channels, barkResolution, sampleRate);
|
||||
bands = spectrum.resize(channels, barkResolution, sampleRate, stft.blockSamples());
|
||||
updateBands();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -196,16 +196,26 @@ private:
|
||||
std::vector<Sample> hz, bwHz;
|
||||
std::vector<std::vector<Sample>> energy;
|
||||
|
||||
size_t resize(size_t channels, Sample barkResolution, Sample sampleRate) {
|
||||
size_t resize(size_t channels, Sample barkResolution, Sample sampleRate, size_t fftBands) {
|
||||
bandsChanged = true;
|
||||
hz.resize(0);
|
||||
bwHz.resize(0);
|
||||
|
||||
Sample maxBwHz = sampleRate/fftBands;
|
||||
auto barkScale = signalsmith::curves::Reciprocal<Sample>::barkScale();
|
||||
Sample barkStep = 1/barkResolution, barkEnd = barkScale.inverse(sampleRate/2);
|
||||
for (Sample bark = barkScale.inverse(0); bark < barkEnd; bark += barkStep) {
|
||||
auto bw = barkScale.dx(bark)*barkStep;
|
||||
if (!hz.empty() && bw >= maxBwHz) {
|
||||
// our Bark scale would be less dense than the FFT, so we might miss data
|
||||
for (auto linearHz = hz.back() + maxBwHz; linearHz < sampleRate/2; linearHz += maxBwHz) {
|
||||
hz.push_back(linearHz);
|
||||
bwHz.push_back(maxBwHz);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
hz.push_back(barkScale(bark));
|
||||
bwHz.push_back(barkScale.dx(bark)*barkStep);
|
||||
bwHz.push_back(bw);
|
||||
}
|
||||
hz.push_back(sampleRate/2);
|
||||
bwHz.push_back(barkScale.dx(barkEnd)*barkStep);
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user